Misleading the Court? As a Witness? As a Representative?

Official, Open and Public Complaint to the ALCD

This Page contains the correspondence with the ALCD

[Previous Page] [Home] [Regional Costs Judge] [Leigh Vs Michelin]

• Forgetting the preamble for now (as clearly ALCD responded)

• ALCD Letter dated 18th June 2008 - received after holidays (OCR)

• ALCD Letter dated 14th July 2008 - received yesterday (15/07/2008) (OCR)

• My response to both (16/07/2008) - As PDF - As HTML

• ALCD Letter dated 17th July 2008 - received today (19/07/08) (OCR)

• Nigel Long's response dated 7th July 2008 - received today (19/07/08) (OCR)

• My email to ALCD (20/07/2008) - As PDF - As HTML

• ALCD email to me (22/06/2008) plus my reply (23/06/2008) - As HTML (only) ***

• A bit slow?  I chased via e-mail (13/08/2008) - As HTML (only)

• A RESULT!!! ALCD letter (19/08/2008) A TRIBUNAL!!! - As PDF (OCR)

• TRIBUNAL Date SET!!! ALCD letter (04/09/2008) - As PDF (OCR)

Now we have Nigel Long's denial - let us pull it apart...

Click HERE

This page is likely to grow.  So far the ALCD have been as good as gold - what a contrast with the OSS/CCS (The Law Society) despite matters being transferred to the Parliamentary Casework Team (Lorriane Gamble and Andrew Croombes) at the request of my MP Dan Norris.  Let us hope that this public approach and the seeming good start does the trick :-)  All for now - last update 23/07/2008.

*** It seems the ALCD don't like web pages.  So I sent them 6 e-mails instead 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 - nothing new, but possibly easier for them?

A costs draughtsman to avoid "at all costs" - Nigel Long, The Boulevard, Weston-Super-Mare

Mr Long is a Fellow of the Association of Law Costs Draughtsmen and was at one time a practicing solicitor (does anyone know... was he struck off?).

Mugshot    Have YOU seen this man?    He should NOT be approached!    One to Avoid!

Mugshot   Have YOU seen this man?    He should NOT be  approached!    One to Avoid!

See here also

According to the ALCD website - here

Fellows
4. No person shall be eligible for admission to the Association as a Fellow unless he satisfies the Council that he is of good character, experience and suitability and is a fit and proper person to be a Fellow of the Association and meets all the following requirements and any other requirements stipulated from time to time by the Council:

Whatever you do I suggest you avoid FDC Law and Nigel Long like the plague.

FDC Law's MAJOR Inadequate Professional Service (opens new window)

ANY bill from this firm and ANY bill produced by Nigel Long should be subjected to the closest scrutiny - check out the Elaine Pitman Page. and the Leigh Vs. Michelin Tyre Page

[Previous Page] [Home] [Top] [Regional Costs Judge] [Leigh Vs Michelin]